![]() Barron, an early owner of our company, said, ‘Everything can be improved.’” “If we want to grow to 5.5 million digital subscribers, and if we continue with churn, traffic and digital growth about where they are today - it will take us on the order of 22 years.”Įlsewhere, the report continued, “As Clarence W. ![]() “Here’s the bottom line,” the report reads. The former, including end users and ordinary people affected by the news stories in question, appear in only about a quarter of the newspaper’s articles, per this report. Also, that reporters ought to quote more “real people” in stories, as opposed to clubby, inside-baseball, expert voices. Those problems included racial news not being sufficiently covered, because WSJ reporters are apparently skittish about pitching ideas to editors. Needless to say, such internecine warfare within the newspaper’s ranks - and spilling onto the pages of the printed product, no less - is an extraordinary turn of events.Īs if that wasn’t enough, the paper also saw a leaked report from within the newspaper itself, which had been circulated among the paper’s leadership, diagnose a number of critical flaws at the institution before it leaked to the public. It was only a couple of months ago when we saw reporters on the news side of The Journal produce a news story that pushed back against a piece prepared by The Journal’s own opinion section, which itself purported to reveal a corruption scheme and shady dealings involving Biden, his son Hunter, and various shadowy elements in Ukraine. ![]() All of which is to say: The WSJ has a serious problem, and it begins and ends with the paper’s nettlesome opinion section.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |